Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Good day! The "Anywhere" search still doesn't behave the way it should. I can use it to search for title or author, but if I use a title + author keyword combination, it doesn't display results. What must I do to fix it? Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
1668 posts
|
We are looking into this issue
On 09/05/2012 07:51 AM, pedroparkero [via NewGenLib] wrote: Good day! The "Anywhere" search still doesn't behave the way it should. I can use it to search for title or author, but if I use a title + author keyword combination, it doesn't display results. What must I do to fix it? Thank you. -- Regards NewGenLib Open Source Support Team
NewGenLib Open Source Support
Verus Solutions Private Limited www.verussolutions.biz |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Thank you. I noticed that the OPAC lost its functionality of ordering the search results by date. Can we have it back?
And I realize that displaying subheadings of subjects in their proper order is a tricky business, as sometimes the rules change (ex., the geographical subdivision can be anywhere after the main subject heading), but is it possible for the subjects to be displayed according to what was indicated when using the cataloging module of the librarian interface (where we can order the subdivision up or down to the desired order)?
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
1668 posts
|
Sure. Both of them will be added. We
will host this in a nightly build shortly
On 09/05/2012 01:36 PM, pedroparkero [via NewGenLib] wrote: Thank you. I noticed that the OPAC lost its functionality of ordering the search results by date. Can we have it back? -- Regards NewGenLib Open Source Support Team
NewGenLib Open Source Support
Verus Solutions Private Limited www.verussolutions.biz |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Thank you.
Also, I want to know why indicator icons are missing in the overdue tab of our End of Day Process: The "Renew Loan Notices" tab, however, still has icons (green circle for successful status, red otherwise). How can I fix it?
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
1668 posts
|
Hi, it seems to work here fine. Can you
please close the application and open it again
And check the result. We will make further tests on this again. Please see the attached image On 09/05/2012 05:30 PM, pedroparkero [via NewGenLib] wrote: Thank you. -- Regards NewGenLib Open Source Support Team Normal_007.jpeg (962K) Download Attachment
NewGenLib Open Source Support
Verus Solutions Private Limited www.verussolutions.biz |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Hello, maybe I deleted or edited something on my end? This has been happening for a month already.
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
In reply to this post by Verus Open Source Support
Will not work just by adding code to our templates? My concern is that a nightly build might overwrite our present templates, so in that case, if a code in the ftl templates is all we need then we can just insert it manually by editing the general.ftl file. If it is that simple, we just want the code to display in OPAC the encoded order of 650 & 651 subfields, if there is any.
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
1668 posts
|
We are now introducing a properties
file for Search and Views
1. In this you can add new fields (MARC21) easily. Example of the properties file will look like below Authors=100,110,111,700,710,711 ISBN=020 ISSN=022 Publisher=260 Edition=250 Subjects=650,651,655,600,610,611 Suppose you want to add Physical description. Just add a line as below PhysicalDescription=300 2. We are now maintaining the order of subfields as it is. 3. Even numeric fields are now handled to be displayed On 09/10/2012 03:43 PM, pedroparkero [via NewGenLib] wrote: Will not work just by adding code to our templates? My concern is that a nightly build might overwrite our present templates, so in that case, if a code in the ftl templates is all we need then we can just insert it manually by editing the general.ftl file. If it is that simple, we just want the code to display in OPAC the encoded order of 650 & 651 subfields, if there is any. -- Regards NewGenLib Open Source Support Team
NewGenLib Open Source Support
Verus Solutions Private Limited www.verussolutions.biz |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Oh, ok. That's good to know. Thanks for the information. Will look forward to this. :-)
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
In reply to this post by Verus Open Source Support
Good day! I haven't been in touch with the community for a while. Is this update already released?
... [show rest of quote]
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
365 posts
|
Okay, I have found the new update, so please disregard my earlier message. Although the "Anywhere" search still isn't working correctly, it did have the sort by year (descending/ascending) back. But please do fix the "Anywhere" search. Make it search in all fields, not just one. (Because right now it doesn't show results if keywords is a combination of title + author).
Also, I have other concerns: 1) While I can give proper punctuation (added semicolon and slash) while viewing a single record because I have edited code in General.ftl thus: <#list Fields.T245 as val><#if val.a ??><#list val.a as data>${data}</#list></#if><#if val.b ??> : <#list val.b as data>${data}</#list></#if><#if val.c ??> / <#list val.c as data>${data}</#list></#if><#if val.n ??> <#list val.n as data>${data}</#list></#if></#list> (See screenshot of single record view) It doesn't appear to be affecting the search view, because the titles in the search results list still don't have punctuations. (See screenshot of search view) How can I make the titles display the same as the single record view? Other problems in the display is that 2) the Physical description is on top of the record but we want it to be lower; 3) the opac doesn't display the letter "ñ" correctly and we also can't get a hit when we search a word with "ñ" or even if we replace that letter with "n"; and 4) if the subject headings have an opening parenthesis and should with a closing parenthesis, the closing parenthesis is never displayed. [See image below] Please help us in addressing all these issues. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------
With great knowledge comes great responsibility. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |